How to start? I don’t want to make
this pre-meditated like most of my writing, which is either carefully sculpted or
hurriedly assembled (uni vs. work), but rather to serve as a train(wreck) of
unmitigated consciousness, unstopped and unhindered by the need to say
something or anything in particular. Rather I foresee it contributing to my
thesis (yes, I now have a ‘my thesis’ can you believe!) by being a
space to process the great amount of information I will be attempting to cram
into my brain over the course of the next 12 months. An opportunity to reflect
on the poignant nuances, downright absurdities or dazzling revelations found in
what I read, without worrying how it all ‘fits’ into the bigger picture. Simple
existence amidst the rush, pull, push, and general distractions of everyday
life. Will I share this with anyone? Perhaps, perhaps not. This is for me, after all.
But back to the beginning. The
start. The inevitable. The task is daunting – how do you research, write, and
give of yourself to create/mould/shape an idea which has ‘meaning’ in just one
short year? Perhaps the universities have it all wrong – pumping out Masters
Students and collecting money for the ‘good of mankind’ without really giving
us a chance to learn, except how to meet deadlines that is. But it really is what you make it. And
SO I have begun.
“But
the eyes are blind. One must look with the heart.” – Antoine De Saint-Exupery
So begins the fourth book (The Aviator’s Wife by Melanie Benjamin)
of twenty which I am setting out to read within the next 40 or so days. To be honest,
I don’t think I will continue with this one. I am learning to recognise the
very subtle difference between what is merely a simple reflection of daily
life/culture (or the way I want daily life to be like) – the socially
acceptable and constructed way of being – and the genuinely life-changing,
moving, provoking, unexpected. Some stories have this innate quality of
engaging ‘the philosopher’ within (or ‘the concerned citizen’) which I
suppose (or hope!) resides in all of us, while others merely reflect what is acceptable
and palpable. Easy to read, easy to forget. That doesn’t mean popular fiction
should be ignored or shunned, but rather that it is simply less than ‘great’
literature; less engaging, less thought-provoking, less life-changing. I think I now understand why Badaracco and Marturano & Perruci
were so insistent on ‘great works of art’ for their research. The ‘great’ being
the ungraspable essence which makes a story exist as an entity seemingly, and perhaps deceptively, separate from its creator and reader, so much so that I almost forget books
like The Poisonwood Bible, The Handmaid’s Tale, and The Narrow Road to the Deep North (to
name a few of my more recent literary endeavours) even had an author, a
thinking, breathing human being who stringed words into meaning.
And so while Katniss Eberdeen or
the Divergent heroine (who even remembers what her name is??) continue to
perpetuate the ‘great man’ myth of leadership by replacing the titular white
male hero with an even whiter female leader who is ‘just as good as a man,’
albeit moodier, I am preparing to slog my way through 20 odd books/plays/short
story collections in order to find the ‘great.’ Oh and to make that harder for
myself, they have to be by female authors, with female characters, practicing
leadership. Sound like an easy requirement? Let me tell you – it’s not. If it’s
one thing women don’t like to write about, its leadership (unless it’s about a
badass, brooding heroine…who's white…and needs men to help her out). Heartache,
love, family, children, relationships, violence, grief, passion, fear,
endurance, etc…that we can do, yes sir. But ‘leadership’ or ‘leading’ beyond
the conventional masculinities of the term? Not so easily.
Here is my list so far, with a few
hopeful empty slots:
Title:
|
Author:
|
Year:
|
Type:
|
A Room of One’s Own
|
Virginia Woolf
|
1926
|
Extended essay
|
The Poisonwood Bible
|
Barbara Kingslover
|
1998
|
Novel
|
The Women’s Room
|
Marilyn French
|
1977
|
Novel
|
Top Girls
|
Caryl Churchill
|
1982
|
Play
|
The Secret Life of Bees
|
Sue Monk Kidd
|
2002
|
Novel
|
The Group
|
Mary McCarthy
|
1963
|
Novel
|
The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
|
Muriel Spark
|
1969
|
Novel
|
Melanie Benjamin
|
2013
|
Historical Fiction
|
|
Cousins
|
Patricia Grace
|
1998
|
NZ Fiction
|
Their Eyes Were Watching God
|
Zora Neale Hurston
|
1937
|
Novel
|
The Golden Notebook
|
Doris Lessing
|
1962
|
Novel
|
Excellent Women
|
Barbara Pym
|
1952
|
Novel
|
The Left Hand of Darkness
|
Ursula K. Le Guin
|
1969
|
Sci-fi Novel
|
How to Be Both
|
Ali Smith
|
2014
|
Novel
|
Outline
|
Rachel Cusk
|
2010
|
Novel
|
I like these women. They’re not
afraid of the unconventional. And I feel that their writing is for something
better, more important than the paycheck or the Man Booker Prize. In the same
way, I feel that ‘authentic’ leadership is for something more than just
effectively managing people or making a company more profitable. Because
really, it’s not exactly authentic to hijack authenticity to do or encourage something
inauthentic. It’s a way of being more
than anything else, starting with self, but flowing onto others. An
individually collective endeavour, a balancing of the innate propensity for
selfishness with the desire to be
better, kinder, engaged and loving to others
as you lead, and without ignoring injustice, inequality or ethical dilemmas for
the ‘good’ of business.
I expect my viewpoints to change
over the next 6 weeks as I read and absorb these stories. And so this journal
is for the simple purpose of capturing change in motion. My change, and my
motion. The who I am now, the who I will be, and the who I could be.
No comments:
Post a Comment